Just as every company undertakes an annual ritual of reviewing financial projections, planning and budgeting, management approach similar to the ISO 9001:2000 quality standard specification. ISO 9001, this process is called management. Usually, these contributions to a regular event held within an organization, the project system than to monitor the performance of its system of quality managementorganizational goals and other criteria as specified in the standard.
In particular, given the ISO 9001 standard series, with the goal of a management review, the system of quality control effectiveness of its relevance, appropriateness y. This system should be based evaluation of existing data (journal entries), and should, all decisions or actions required to improve the programand related processes (output control).
To define the terms of adequacy, relevance and effectiveness:
Adaptation - enough to satisfy a demand or need *. A quality management system should be capable of satisfying applicable regulations, including those specified by the customer organization, and all applicable rules and / or regulations.
Suitability - The quality of having properties for the specific purpose *. Qualityresource management system must be able to sustain the current level of organization with a good dose of organization.
Efficiency - enough to reach a goal, or is likely to produce the desired result *. A system of quality management must conform to the parties to organize their own requirements, customers and other stakeholders.
* Random House Unabridged Dictionary © Random House, Inc. 2006th
AsMinimum, such examinations should be performed every year, but it can be done on a more frequent basis, quarterly or even monthly. Personally, I recommend that relevant agencies to act with "new" systems, this feature more often, at least during the first 18-24 months.
Most of them should be maintained in accordance with the process of writing a check reference. These data should, at a minimum, the date of the visit, participants reviewmeasured by criteria that the system's strengths and weaknesses of the system and all decisions or actions needed.
To support the organization of this process is new to this, I have attached under the management model reviewed below. These issues should be "minimal," as it sees fit, and this bill should be amended or extended, any problems or other considerations that the organization may face.
EntertainmentThe next Management Review
1. Performance Evaluation CGT
1.1. Management System
1.2. GSC Policy
1.3. QMS objectives and targets
2. Entrance exam
2.1. The results of
2.2. Communication from external parties, including complaints
2.3. Process Performance / Compliance
2.4. Status of preventive and corrective
2.5. Monitoring of previous management reviews
2.6. StaffStatus
2.7. Change management system can affect these
3. TEST RESULTS
3.1. Options for improving the management system:
3.2. Resource requirements:
3.3. For CGT purposes for the year:
0 comments:
Post a Comment